voices: Our water utility bill contains a Sanitary Appliance Fee, a Waterborne Fee and a Water Conservation Tax.
Is tax on tax equitable?
FROM TONY LOKE YUE CHONG - 10July2013.
Our water utility bill contains a Sanitary Appliance Fee, a Waterborne Fee and a Water Conservation Tax.
The PUB describes the first two fees as levies to offset the cost of
treating used water and for operating and maintaining the public
sewerage system. Both charges are tax contributions to Singapore’s used
water system. The Water Conservation Tax is charged for the use of
water. It is levied to reinforce the importance of conserving water.
It is clear that the three charges are deemed as taxes. Notwithstanding
that, the Goods and Services Tax is imposed on these levies — effectively a tax on tax. This may be technically legal, but the important question for consumers is whether it is equitable.
http://www.todayonline.com/voices/tax-tax-equitable
Resources:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax :"According to Black's Law Dictionary, a
tax is a 'pecuniary burden laid upon individuals or property owners to
support the government [...] a payment exacted by legislative
authority'. "
References:
- 'Double tax for water use not fair': "Why does one have to
pay a double tax – the conservation tax and GST on it – just to get
water from a tap? The authority should look into the issue as it seems
oppressive, considering that water is a basic necessity." [My Paper, 05Sept2011]
Tags: Taxation, government, finance, revenue, budget, Singapore, law, resource, water,
===========
At:
SBY:
10July2013: [GST]: Is tax on tax equitable?
A1:
10July2013: [GST]: Is tax on tax equitable?
10July2013: [GST]: Is tax on tax equitable?
10July2013: [GST]: Is tax on tax equitable?
10July2013: [GST]: Is tax on tax equitable?
10July2013: [GST]: Is tax on tax equitable?
No comments:
Post a Comment