"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."-- Benjamin Franklin.

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

Condo owners sue developer, 7 other parties over alleged defects

Condo owners sue developer, 7 other parties over alleged defects
05:56 AM Feb 08, 2011
by Leong Wee Keat
SINGAPORE - They allege that their basement car park has 280 points of water leakage, that their swimming pool has sharp surfaces that cut swimmers and ruin their swimwear, and that a third of their condominium's 51 units are leaking rainwater.

These are some of the alleged defects that disgruntled unit owners of freehold development Emery Point, an 18-storey single residential tower at Ipoh Lane in Katong, are citing in a lawsuit against its developer, main contractor, sub-contractors and architect - eight parties in all.
As the case began in the High Court yesterday, City Developments Limited (CDL) said in defence that "some defects to the common property" arose from the contractor's poor workmanship, even as CDL's lawyer Ling Tien Wah argued that "there's no such thing as a perfect building".
CDL intends to show during the 10-day hearing that it is contractually liable to only two owners who bought their units before the completion date in September 2003.
"Caveat emptor applied to owners who bought units from CDL after the Certificate of Statutory Completion date and, as such, even if there are building defects, these owners have no remedy against CDL," said Mr Ling.
But Mr Leo Cheng Suan, lawyer for the condominium's current management corporation, said that as CDL's managers were council members of the management corporation until 2007 and "fully aware" of the issues, the company had "shirked" its duty.
The management corporation's role will also be highlighted by main contractor Hytech Builders and two sub-contractors, Heng Boon Seng Construction and Industrial Contracts Marketing, who claim that it failed to maintain the property and that any problems were caused by wear and tear.
But, Mr Leo feels, this "misses the point" as the alleged defects had surfaced early. "These defendants are only prepared to do cosmetic patch repairs at the very least possible cost: Grouting time and time again, applying silicone to try to stop the leaks for a few months until the silicone dries up and the occupiers scream at them again," he said.
Tender prices submitted by three general contractors indicate that rectification work may cost between $512,380 and $626,350.
URL http://www.todayonline.com/Singapore/EDC110208-0000206/Condo-owners-sue-developer,-7-other-parties-over-alleged-defects
Copyright 2011 MediaCorp Pte Ltd | All Rights Reserved
----------
At/ related:
Todayonline.com
09Feb2011: Emery Point owners settle feud with CDL
------------------------------------------
08 February 11 The Strait Times
by Selina Lum
Emery Point defects: CDL and others sued

THE residents of Emery Point condominium have sued listed developer City Developments Limited (CDL), the main contractor, five subcontractors and the architect over numerous building defects.
The condo's management corporation, representing the owners, is claiming about $600,000 in compensation to rectify defects in 17 areas.
These include a leaking basement carpark, which is located below a swimming pool, cracks in walls, and lift lobbies with ceilings damaged by rainwater.
The case opened in the High Court yesterday, and is fixed for a 10-day hearing.
Emery Point, an 18-storey block of 51 units at Ipoh Lane in the Tanjong Katong area, is a freehold development completed in 2003, but not fully sold until 2007.
In his opening statement, lawyer Leo Cheng Suan, representing the condo owners, said that CDL was fully aware of the defects. 'The plaintiffs are extremely disappointed that CDL, being a public-listed company, did not live up to its social responsibility to build quality homes.'
He said many of the defects were caused by the long period in which the unsold units were closed up, and exposed to high heat and humidity.
Some defects were discovered in September 2003, when the Building and Construction Authority issued a certificate of statutory completion (CSC) for the development. Others were discovered after the management corporation assumed responsibility for the condo's common property from CDL in July 2005.

Around July 2007, the owners hired building surveyors to conduct an audit, which found extensive defects and shortcomings in 17 areas.
Highlighting the key defects, Mr Leo said the most glaring one was in the basement carpark, which had been 'leaking since the very beginning'.
Despite numerous repairs, the carpark, located below the swimming pool, is an 'unwanted water feature', said Mr Leo.
He also noted that a building surveyor hired by CDL and main contractor Hytech Builders had conceded that there were a 'staggering' 280 points of water leakage in the carpark.
The low fencing of the children's playground also poses a 'death trap' for children if they were to climb over it and fall right into the basement carpark, said Mr Leo.
Other defects include leaky windows and cracks in the tennis court surface.
Mr Leo said the defendants were prepared to do only cosmetic patch repairs at the lowest possible cost, such as 'applying silicone to try to stop the leaks for a few months'. The lawyer described these as 'delay tactics' to 'wear out' the owners until the warranties expire.
CDL, represented by Mr Ling Tien Wah, conceded that there were defects due to the contractors' 'poor workmanship', but contended that 'there is no such thing as a perfect building'.
The developer argued that it was liable only for defects for the two units sold before the CSC date. As for the rest of the owners, who had bought their units after that, CDL was not liable for any defects found in these units.
The key defence raised by the other defendants was that the problems were not defects, but were caused by wear and tear.
selinal@sph.com.sg
http://www.straitstimes.com/BreakingNews/Singapore/Story/STIStory_632377.html
================
At/ related:
09Feb2011: Emery Point owners settle feud with CDL

No comments:

Post a Comment